Correction and Retraction

Publication Ethics and Research Integrity

Correction and Retraction Policy

JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) · Universitas Suryadarma

Policy Statement
JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), Universitas Suryadarma, is committed to preserving the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. When errors or potential ethical breaches are identified in a published article, the Editorial Board will assess the available evidence and determine the appropriate action in accordance with the seriousness and nature of the issue and relevant publication ethics guidance.

01. Corrections (Erratum / Corrigendum)

A correction may be issued when an unintentional error is identified in a published article and the error does not invalidate or fundamentally undermine the research findings or conclusions.

Examples may include:

  • Typographical or editorial errors that affect the accuracy or interpretation of the text.
  • Incorrect formulas, equations, tables, or figures that can be corrected without invalidating the principal findings.
  • Other limited errors that require formal clarification to maintain the accuracy of the scholarly record.

The correction notice will identify the affected article and clearly describe the correction. The original article and its correction notice will be linked where technically feasible.

02. Retractions

Retraction may be considered when serious problems undermine the reliability, validity, or ethical integrity of a published article. Such circumstances may include confirmed research misconduct, fabricated or falsified data, extensive plagiarism, or other major issues that invalidate the findings or conclusions.

Retraction Notice

A retracted article will remain accessible as part of the scholarly record, where feasible, and will be clearly marked with a prominent RETRACTED label or watermark. An official retraction notice will explain the reason for the retraction to the extent that the available evidence and applicable ethical or legal considerations permit.

Retraction decisions will be made by the Editorial Board following careful assessment of the available evidence and consultation with relevant parties where appropriate. The journal will refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines when determining the appropriate course of action.

Assessment and Editorial Procedure

When a potential error or ethical concern is reported, the journal will review the information and supporting evidence before deciding on an appropriate response. Depending on the circumstances, the process may involve:

01 · Initial Review

Assessing the reported issue, the affected article, and the evidence available.

02 · Verification and Clarification

Seeking explanations from the authors and consulting relevant experts or institutions where appropriate.

03 · Editorial Decision

Determining whether a correction, retraction, or another appropriate editorial notice is warranted.

04 · Publication of Notice

Publishing an appropriate notice and linking it to the original article where feasible to maintain transparency and traceability.

Commitment to the Integrity of the Scholarly Record

JSI aims to ensure that published research remains accurate, transparent, and trustworthy. Corrections and retractions are handled according to the nature of the issue, the evidence available, and applicable publication ethics guidance. A retraction is intended to correct the scholarly record and does not, by itself, determine the legal responsibility of any individual.