Fidelity Testing of Avionic Instruments in NAS 332 Super Puma Simulator Using FAA 14 CFR Part 60
Fidelity Testing of Avionic Instruments in NAS 332 Super Puma Simulator Using FAA 14 CFR Part 60
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35968/jsi.v13i1.1676Kata Kunci:
Flight Simulator Fidelity, Avionic Instrument Testing, Flight Simulator, Fidelity Testing, Pilot Training EffectivenessAbstrak
Simulation technology is increasingly vital in aviation, enhancing pilot training and reducing risks from human error. This study evaluates the fidelity of the NAS-332 Super Puma Helicopter Full Flight Simulator (FFS) Level-C, focusing on avionic instruments. The assessment aimed to determine how closely the simulator replicates the aircraft’s avionic hardware, software, and operational performance. A black-box testing approach was applied in accordance with FAA 14 CFR Part 60 Advisory Circular standards. Avionic subsystems were examined for accuracy in display layouts, response functions, and system integration. Findings show that the simulator achieves a fidelity score of 89%, confirming its reliability in replicating real-world avionics. These findings confirm the simulator’s suitability as a regulatory-compliant training tool that supports pilot proficiency and operational readiness. By highlighting avionics fidelity within the broader context of human-computer interaction and workload research, the study extends current simulation literature and contributes to improving the effectiveness of rotorcraft pilot training.Referensi
Awaludin, M., & Gani, A. (2024). Pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan pada algoritma k-means klastering dan sentiment analysis terhadap strategi promosi yang sukses untuk penerimaan mahasiswa baru. JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) Universitas Suryadarma, 11(1), 1–6.
Awaludin, M., Nuryadi, H., & Pribadi, G. N. (2024). Sistem Otomatisasi Laporan untuk Optimalisasi Pelaporan Data Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat di Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma. JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) Universitas Suryadarma, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/jsi.v12i1
Carroll, M., & Dahlström, N. (2021). Human–computer interaction on the modern flight deck. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(9), 877–889.
DSL (2010). Technical Description Indonesian Air Force (TNI-AU) Helicopter Simulator for Super Puma. DSL International Projects and Supplies Ltd.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2016). Code of Federal Register, chapter 60. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Flight Standards Service.
Garson, G.D.(2013). Scale and Measure. Statistical Associates Blue Book.
Harris, D. J. (2023). Assessing expertise using eye tracking in a virtual reality flight simulator. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1), 45.
Hebbar, P. A., et al. (2023). Cognitive Load Estimation in VR Flight Simulator. Journal of Eye Movement Research / PMC.
Liu, D. V. (2004). Measuring simulation fidelity: A conceptual study (Vol. 2). In T. J. Franceschini (Ed.), Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference (HPSAA).
Mark, J. A., et al. (2022). Neuroadaptive Training via fNIRS in Flight Simulators. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.
NATO STO AVT-296 Task Group. (2021). Rotorcraft flight simulation model update and fidelity assessment methods. NATO Science and Technology Organization.
Schricker, B., & Franceschini, T. J. (2001). Fidelity evaluation framework. In 34th Annual Simulation Symposium. IEEE.
Shen, Z., et al. (2024). Human-computer interaction interface design of flight simulator based on situation awareness. Scientific Reports.
Taylor, K., et al. (2025). Comparison and validation of an immersive flight simulator for novice training. Ergonomics, 68(2), 2525956.
Van Weelden, E., et al. (2024). Exploring the impact of virtual reality flight simulations on performance and workload. (Ergonomics / Applied Cognitive Psychology outlet)
White, M., & Padfield, G. (2021). Rotorcraft simulation fidelity and accident analysis. CEAS Aeronautical Journal.
