STRATEGI PENYALURAN PUPUK BERSUBSIDI DI INDONESIA

Ragimun Ragimun, Makmun Makmun, Sigit Setiawan

Sari


o realize food self-sufficiency in Indonesia, it needs to be supported by effective distribution of subsidized
fertilizer. The main causes of ineffective distribution of subsidized fertilizers are irregularities, weak oversight
from implementing institutions and weak community control. Likewise, the aspects of transparency and
information disclosure in the chain of subsidized fertilizer implementation are also still weak. So far, the
regulations governing the mechanism for implementing subsidized fertilizer distribution policies are quite
adequate but their implementation is still weak. In this study a descriptive approach is used to explore and
describe the development of distribution as well as the strategies adopted to obtain more effective alternative
distribution of subsidized fertilizer. This study also compares the policy of distribution of subsidized fertilizers
in several countries. Based on the results of the study, several schemes or alternative distribution of subsidized
fertilizer are still needed in Indonesia. Irregularities occur because of errors in the collection of data "RDKK",
the distribution of subsidized fertilizers to unauthorized parties, the large volume of distribution, procurement
and distribution of subsidized fertilizers as well as the obstacles in calculating fertilizer subsidies. One
recommendation that can be submitted for the distribution of subsidized fertilizers effectively is that several
alternative channels can be implemented. One alternative for the distribution of subsidized fertilizers includes
the use of an electric card through "Gapoktan", distribution of fertilizer subsidies through the use of the Pupuk
Indonesia Mart kiosk and through direct distribution to fertilizer producers in Indonesia.

Keywords: fertilizer subsidy policy, distribution scheme, food self-sufficiency


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Adnyana, M.O., & K. Kariyasa. (2000).

Perumusan kebijakan harga gabah dan

pupuk dalam era pasar bebas. Bogor:

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan

Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian.

BKF. (2016). Kajian Kebijakan Pemerintah,

Analisis Kebijakan Subsidi diunduh

tanggal 22 Agustus 2019 dari

.http://www.fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/dwkontenview.asp?id=201609271127422

BKF.

(2016). Kajian

perumusan draf Standar Operasional

dan Prosedur (SOP) perubahan

mekanisme penyaluran pupuk

bersubsidi secara langsung sebagai

tindak lanjut perluasan uji coba Subsidi

Langsung Pupuk (SLP). Diunduh

tanggal 18 Desember 2018 dari

http://www.fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/data

/document/2018/kajian/SOPPupukdan

PerluasanUjicobaSLP.pdf.

CNBC Indonesia. (2019). Soal Jokowi Hobi

Impor Beras, Kemendag Keluarkan

Data Baru. Diunduh pada tanggal 12

Desember

dari

https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/

-4-53339/soaljokowihobi-impor-beras-kemendagkeluarkandata-baru

Direktorat

Pupuk dan Pestisida. (2012).

Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja

Direktorat Pupuk dan Pestisida Ditjen

Sarana dan Prasarana Pertanian

Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2012.

Jakarta: Direktorat Pupuk dan Pestisida,

Kementerian Pertanian.

Darwis, V., & Supriyati. (2014). Subsidi

pupuk: Kebijakan, pelaksanaan, dan

optimalisasi pemanfaatannya. Jurnal

Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 11(1),

-60.

Feryanto, W.K, & Mantau, Z. (2010). Pupuk

dan subsidi: Kebijakan yang tidak tepat

sasaran. Diunduh tanggal 16 Agustus

dari

http://feryanto.wk.staff.ipb.ac.id/2010/

/20/koperasi-dan-posisi-tawar

petani/.

Grindle, M.S. (2012). Good enough

governance: Poverty reduction and

reform in developing countries.

Governance, 17(4), 525-548.

Handoko, R., & Patriadi, P. (2005). Evaluasi

kebijakan subsidi non-BBM. Jurnal

Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 9(4),

-64.

Houssou, N., Asante-Addo, C., Andam, K.S.,

& Ragasa, C. (2018). How can African

Governments reach poor farmers with

fertiliser subsidies? Exploring a

targeting approach in Ghana. The

Journal of Development Studies, 1-25.

Hendrawan, D.S., Daryanto, A., Sanim, B., &

Siregar, H. (2011). Analisis kebijakan

subsidi pupuk: Pola penentuan subsidi

dan sistem distribusi pupuk di

Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan

Agribisnis, 8(2), 85-96

Institut Global for Justice. (2016). Free trade

watch berebut krisis menjaring utang,

Mengimpor Pangan. Edisi II. Jakarta:

IGJ.

Keban, T. Yeremias. (2004). Enam dimensi

strategis administrasi publik, konsep,

teori dan isu. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Kementerian Keuangan. (2018). Nota

keuangan dan RAPBN 2019. Jakarta:

Kementerian Keuangan.

Khudori. (2008). Ironi negeri beras.

Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

Kariyasa, K., & Y. Yusdja. (2005). Evaluasi

kebijakan sistem distribusi Pupuk Urea

di Indonesia: Kasus Provinsi Jawa

Barat. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian,

(3), 201-216.

Li Sheng, & Zhang Yaoqi. (2014). Fertilizer

industry subsidies in China: Who are

the beneficiaries? China Agricultural

Economic Review, 6(3), 433-451.

Lubis, K.A. (2015). Kesejahteraan rakyat dan

alokasi anggaran. Jakarta: Badan

Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan,

Kementerian Keuangan.

Nasrin, M., Bauer, S., & Arman, Md. (2018).

Assessing the impact of fertilizer subsidy on farming efficiency: A case

of Bangladeshi farmers. Open

Agriculture, 3, 567-577.

Ramli, N.N., Shamsudin, M.N., Mohamed, Z.,

& Radam, A. (2012). The impact of

fertilizer subsidy on Malaysia

Paddy/Rice Industry using a System

Dynamics Approach. International

Journal of Social Science and

Humanity, 2(3), 219-213

Suryana, A., Agustian, A., & Yofa, R.D.

(2016). Alternatif kebijakan penyaluran

subsidi pupuk bagi petani pangan.

Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian,

(1), 35-54.

Sharma, V.P., & Thaker, H. (2010). Fertiliser

subsidy in India: Who are the

beneficiaries? Economy and Political

Weekly, 45(12), 68-76.

Tahir, M.A. (2011). Kebijakan publik dan

transparansi penyelenggaraan

pemerintahan daerah (Ed. Pertama).

(H. Hadjarati, Penyunt.) Jakarta

Pusat: PT. Pustaka Indonesia Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35968/m-pu.v10i1.369

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Indexed by: